Review





Similar Products

90
Respironics actiwatch spectrum watch
Actiwatch Spectrum Watch, supplied by Respironics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/watch/actiwatch+2/nct06192745-32-6-10
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
actiwatch spectrum watch - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Garmin Ltd activity tracking watch
Activity Tracking Watch, supplied by Garmin Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/watch/activity+tracking+watch/nct06291922-1-19-19
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
activity tracking watch - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ActiGraph llc centrepoint insight watch
Centrepoint Insight Watch, supplied by ActiGraph llc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/watch/centrepoint+insight+watch/nct04091386-0-16-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
centrepoint insight watch - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Polar Electro polar unite fitness watch
Polar Unite Fitness Watch, supplied by Polar Electro, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/watch/worn+wrist/pm42315352-157-8-14
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polar unite fitness watch - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Polar Electro polar v800 watch
Polar V800 Watch, supplied by Polar Electro, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/watch/heart+monitors+rate/pm42275398-78-6-19
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polar v800 watch - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Xiaomi Inc huawei watch
Huawei Watch, supplied by Xiaomi Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/watch/huawei+watch/pm42259208-6-25-27
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
huawei watch - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Respironics actigraphy watch
Actigraphy Watch, supplied by Respironics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/watch/actigraphy+watch/pm42252045-408-17-24
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
actigraphy watch - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Garmin Ltd market leaders apple watch se
Market Leaders Apple Watch Se, supplied by Garmin Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/watch/apple+watch/pmc13272178-112-29-35
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
market leaders apple watch se - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Xiaomi Inc thaisook watches
Bland–Altman plots comparing heart rate measurements from four smartwatches against the Polar H10 reference. (a) Apple Watch shows negligible bias ( − 0.05 BPM) with tight limits of agreement ( − 6.20 to 6.09 BPM), indicating strong agreement. (b) Garmin smartwatch demonstrates a small bias ( − 0.70 BPM) and moderate limits of agreement ( − 11.31 to 9.90 BPM), suggesting stable performance across heart-rate ranges. (c) <t>ThaiSook</t> smartwatch exhibits a larger negative bias ( − 5.27 BPM) with wide limits of agreement ( − 34.54 to 23.99 BPM), reflecting substantial variability and sensitivity to motion artifacts. (d) Xiaomi smartwatch shows an underestimation tendency ( − 3.62 BPM) and broad limits of agreement ( − 29.64 to 22.39 BPM), particularly at higher heart rates.
Thaisook Watches, supplied by Xiaomi Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/watch/thaisook+watches/pmc13272178-85-5-3
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
thaisook watches - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Garmin Ltd thaisook watch
Bland–Altman plots comparing heart rate measurements from four smartwatches against the Polar H10 reference. (a) Apple Watch shows negligible bias ( − 0.05 BPM) with tight limits of agreement ( − 6.20 to 6.09 BPM), indicating strong agreement. (b) Garmin smartwatch demonstrates a small bias ( − 0.70 BPM) and moderate limits of agreement ( − 11.31 to 9.90 BPM), suggesting stable performance across heart-rate ranges. (c) <t>ThaiSook</t> smartwatch exhibits a larger negative bias ( − 5.27 BPM) with wide limits of agreement ( − 34.54 to 23.99 BPM), reflecting substantial variability and sensitivity to motion artifacts. (d) Xiaomi smartwatch shows an underestimation tendency ( − 3.62 BPM) and broad limits of agreement ( − 29.64 to 22.39 BPM), particularly at higher heart rates.
Thaisook Watch, supplied by Garmin Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/watch/thaisook+watch/pmc13272178-131-14-16
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
thaisook watch - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Bland–Altman plots comparing heart rate measurements from four smartwatches against the Polar H10 reference. (a) Apple Watch shows negligible bias ( − 0.05 BPM) with tight limits of agreement ( − 6.20 to 6.09 BPM), indicating strong agreement. (b) Garmin smartwatch demonstrates a small bias ( − 0.70 BPM) and moderate limits of agreement ( − 11.31 to 9.90 BPM), suggesting stable performance across heart-rate ranges. (c) ThaiSook smartwatch exhibits a larger negative bias ( − 5.27 BPM) with wide limits of agreement ( − 34.54 to 23.99 BPM), reflecting substantial variability and sensitivity to motion artifacts. (d) Xiaomi smartwatch shows an underestimation tendency ( − 3.62 BPM) and broad limits of agreement ( − 29.64 to 22.39 BPM), particularly at higher heart rates.

Journal: Frontiers in Sports and Active Living

Article Title: Impact of central adiposity on the heart rate and calorie estimation accuracy of diverse smartwatches and the resulting subjective exercise experience

doi: 10.3389/fspor.2026.1829700

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland–Altman plots comparing heart rate measurements from four smartwatches against the Polar H10 reference. (a) Apple Watch shows negligible bias ( − 0.05 BPM) with tight limits of agreement ( − 6.20 to 6.09 BPM), indicating strong agreement. (b) Garmin smartwatch demonstrates a small bias ( − 0.70 BPM) and moderate limits of agreement ( − 11.31 to 9.90 BPM), suggesting stable performance across heart-rate ranges. (c) ThaiSook smartwatch exhibits a larger negative bias ( − 5.27 BPM) with wide limits of agreement ( − 34.54 to 23.99 BPM), reflecting substantial variability and sensitivity to motion artifacts. (d) Xiaomi smartwatch shows an underestimation tendency ( − 3.62 BPM) and broad limits of agreement ( − 29.64 to 22.39 BPM), particularly at higher heart rates.

Article Snippet: While the low-cost Xiaomi and ThaiSook watches exhibited higher HR errors during motion-intensive activities, their derived calorie expenditure estimates remained remarkably stable and consistent with the reference standard.

Techniques:

Bland–Altman plots comparing heart rate measurements from four smartwatches against the Polar H10 reference. (a) Apple Watch shows negligible bias ( − 0.05 BPM) with tight limits of agreement ( − 6.20 to 6.09 BPM), indicating strong agreement. (b) Garmin smartwatch demonstrates a small bias ( − 0.70 BPM) and moderate limits of agreement ( − 11.31 to 9.90 BPM), suggesting stable performance across heart-rate ranges. (c) ThaiSook smartwatch exhibits a larger negative bias ( − 5.27 BPM) with wide limits of agreement ( − 34.54 to 23.99 BPM), reflecting substantial variability and sensitivity to motion artifacts. (d) Xiaomi smartwatch shows an underestimation tendency ( − 3.62 BPM) and broad limits of agreement ( − 29.64 to 22.39 BPM), particularly at higher heart rates.

Journal: Frontiers in Sports and Active Living

Article Title: Impact of central adiposity on the heart rate and calorie estimation accuracy of diverse smartwatches and the resulting subjective exercise experience

doi: 10.3389/fspor.2026.1829700

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland–Altman plots comparing heart rate measurements from four smartwatches against the Polar H10 reference. (a) Apple Watch shows negligible bias ( − 0.05 BPM) with tight limits of agreement ( − 6.20 to 6.09 BPM), indicating strong agreement. (b) Garmin smartwatch demonstrates a small bias ( − 0.70 BPM) and moderate limits of agreement ( − 11.31 to 9.90 BPM), suggesting stable performance across heart-rate ranges. (c) ThaiSook smartwatch exhibits a larger negative bias ( − 5.27 BPM) with wide limits of agreement ( − 34.54 to 23.99 BPM), reflecting substantial variability and sensitivity to motion artifacts. (d) Xiaomi smartwatch shows an underestimation tendency ( − 3.62 BPM) and broad limits of agreement ( − 29.64 to 22.39 BPM), particularly at higher heart rates.

Article Snippet: Participants wore four commercially available wrist-worn smartwatches throughout the entire 45 min exercise protocol: ThaiSook Watch, Garmin Forerunner 245, Apple Watch SE, and Xiaomi Watch Lite.

Techniques: